News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Environment 
 High Court talks on Murray, Coorong 

High Court talks on Murray, Coorong

15 Aug, 2008 04:09 PM
Environmental and constitutional lawyers were meeting in Adelaide and Canberra yesterday, as Federal Cabinet signalled it had given up the fight to save the Coorong.

Federal Cabinet met in Adelaide Town Hall and was briefed by the Murray Darling Basin Commission. But Federal Water Minister Penny Wong has already surrendered, saying she believes the lower lakes and Coorong are lost.

“There is not enough water in the system to bring down the sorts of quantities of water you’d need to fill the lower lakes,” she said. Cabinet late yesterday announced it would commission an independent audit of all public and private water in the system. The Murray Darling Basin Commission released its own assessment of the water crisis.

“Some areas of the basin are still in deficit, meaning they do not have enough water for critical human, stock and domestic needs,” commission chief executive Les Roberts said. The Greens yesterday proposed a Senate Inquiry.

“The Coorong and lower lakes need a drink before Christmas. The water is there but the political will isn’t. When governments fail to act, the people, through the Senate, must provide action,” Greens Leader Bob Brown said in Canberra.

“River communities do not accept Senator Wong’s statements that the Coorong is lost,” SA Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young said. “There is water available in storages in both NSW and Victoria, including Menindee Lakes.”

The Prime Minister blamed the Howard Government. “These problems have been emerging for the last six to 12 years. We have a record of inaction by our predecessors,” Mr Rudd said.

The Prime Minister, who addressed a meeting in the southern Adelaide suburb of Hallett Cove last night, told a disappointed and disbelieving South Australia that the Federal Government had done as much as it could it could to save Murray and Lower Lakes. Lawyers yesterday prepared to take over where politicians failed.

Teams of barristers and environmentalists are seeing if they can force the Commonwealth to protect the lakes through international treaties, the trading powers in the Constitution, or by the use of the federal Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.

“Australia has signed the Ramsar Convention,” Adelaide University Professor of Law Andrew Stewart said yesterday. “This is an international treaty which imposes obligations on the Commonwealth to protect Ramsar-listed wetlands.” The Federal Government is therefore obliged to protect the ecological character of Lakes Albert and Alexandrina and the Coorong. Under the international agreement the Commonwealth must include wetland conservation in its national land-use planning.

Twenty-five years ago, after a landmark case in the High Court, the Commonwealth used its external affairs powers to protect the World Heritage-listed wilderness in Tasmania and stop the Franklin dam. “This case is more complex,” Prof Stewart said. “It doesn’t mean that the Federal Government can automatically use those powers over the Coorong.”

But lawyers are looking at different possibilities for a legal challenge. The professor of environmental law at Uni SA, Rob Fowler, met constitutional barristers in Adelaide yesterday, acting for the Lower Murray River, Lakes and Coorong action group. While Mr Rudd said he would accelerate buying up water licences for environmental flows yesterday, Prof Fowler attacked the issuing tradable water licences in the first place, calling them a private property right over a public resource. “It was a market economy solution that just hasn’t worked,” he said.

But the Federal Government or other parties could still go to the High Court. They may be able to mount a case against the state-federal agreement, applauded at the time by SA Premier Mike Rann, to cap tradable licences across river catchments.

Prof Fowler said the Commonwealth’s powers over trading corporations could be used to free up licences. Meanwhile, lawyers and pressure groups are still poring over the Development Act to see if it can be used to stop the Wellington Weir. The State Government is preparing to dam the Murray at Wellington, and then open the Goolwa barrages to flood the lower lakes with sea water up to the dam. This would turn the lower Murray and lakes into a tidal estuary.

Before the last federal election, the then Federal River Murray Minister Malcolm Turnbull ruled that the Commonwealth had the power to stop the Wellington Weir. The Independent Weekly has now learned that the State Government prepared an environmental impact statement into the effects of building the dam, that it has spent almost 12 months doing that study, and that information in that study has already been discussed at a state-federal level.

The Independent Weekly further understands that if SA decided to build the Wellington dam, the present federal Labor Government will not stand in its way: that is, Ms Wong will not invoke the same Commonwealth powers Mr Turnbull threatened he could use.

State Water Security Minister Karlene Maywald’s office said yesterday the EIS was two weeks from completion, and it would be up to Ms Wong to decide whether it would be released publicly.

SA and Victoria were keen to hand over control to a new Federal Government body at the time of federation, but were thwarted by NSW. In the 1890s the Bulletin magazine reported: “No one knows at present how far irrigation may yet go, but in all probability it will one day be conducted on so vast a scale that, in dry or even moderately dry years, practically all the waters of the Murray system will be used up, and, so far as navigation purposes are concerned, that group of rivers will cease to exist. SA would then be wholly at the mercy of the other provinces.”

With the Rudd Government now publicly saying the lower lakes are lost and apparently going to water over the weir, Lakes Alexandrina and Albert and the Coorong are almost certain to be sacrificed to irrigators in other states.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Dear Hendrik, I would like to comment on your article re the Lower Lakes and Coorong situation. One of the frequent weaknesses of articles in the Independent Weekly is that items are presented as information when in fact they are only a mix of some fact and biased opinion. This article is one of them. To me it suggests that you had an ulterior parochial and political motive in choosing to write the article in the way that you did. I would like this promising newspaper to be more explicit in its differentiation between information and opinion about issues. I would like to make the following points about the reporting of the Murray crisis: • It should not be too difficult for professional journalists to access comprehensive information about the whole picture. • The upstream water storage in a time of serious drought is not going to be used for the sake of flushing lakes that historically have always been tidal estuarine lakes. • The problem of the acid soils poisoning the lower lakes can only be prevented by covering them with available water-sea water. If storages upstream dry up the acid soils in those storages and billabongs will poison the whole of the Murray as it flows into SA with disastrous consequences for every town and irrigator along the way including Adelaide. • I understand that the drainage schemes of the South East of SA allow significant amounts of fresh water to go into the sea. Emergency diversion of some of that water into the southern Coorong could help perhaps. • In the longer term the Lower Lakes could be modified to contain large areas of tidal salt water using levees and ‘dykes’ (producing a sufficient flow to keep the Murray mouth open without the need for dredging), while essential channels of fresh Murray water would still flow along most of the existing irrigating communities. • My understanding is that the productive capacity of the huge upstream irrigation projects, especially rice, are actually producing much greater income per litre of water than much of the SA irrigation sector is achieving. • The SA parochial and biased political stance does not seem realistic when the Murray-Darling issue is looked at as a whole. Let it rain! Regards R Hoogland rhoogland@hotmail.com
Posted by Ron, 18/08/2008 10:33:22 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Indaily
1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 6%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press



The Independent Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...