News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Premier Rann denies affair claims 

Premier Rann denies affair claims

23 Nov, 2009 02:25 PM
South Australian Premier Mike Rann says he will sue Channel Seven and New Idea over an interview confession of a married barmaid alleging they had a sexual affair.

"I have not had sex with her," he told a media briefing this afternoon in response to allegations he had sex with Michelle Chantelois by a golf course and in his office.

Ms Chantelois, in a paid interview with the Seven Network screened yesterday, claimed she had a lengthy affair with the Premier that included sex on his Parliament House desk.

But Mr Rann said those allegations were absurd.

"I have not had sex with her and the idea that I would have sex between meetings in my office in Parliament Office while parliament was sitting is so patently ridiculous, I would have thought all of you would have known this," he told reporters.

Mr Rann said he had a friendship with Ms Chantelois over several years which he described as "funny" and "flirty".

Mr Rann said the allegations in the interview on Network Seven's Sunday Night program were designed to do him damage, both personally and politically.

He said there were a whole series of things said on the program that were totally false.

"There were suggestions that I had sex on the floor of Parliament House, in my office, between meetings while parliament was sitting," he said.

"Any one of you who is a political reporter would know how absolutely ridiculous and absurd that would be.

"My office is like a train station, a revolving door on grand central station.

"I am constantly surrounded by advisers, members of parliament come in and out, ministers come in and out, staffers come in and out, members of the opposition come in and out.

"The suggestion that I would have sex on a golf course in Adelaide, as a fairly visible citizen of this state, is totally, absolutely ridiculous.

"So I reject these allegations and I can say today that I will be taking legal action against Channel 7 and New Idea for allegations that are totally, absolutely untrue."

Asked if he had ever had sex with Ms Chantelois at any place, Mr Rann said he had "rejected those allegations of having sex with her".

"I have not had sex with her," he said.

Mr Rann said none of the allegations against him had anything to do with his job as premier of South Australia and he did not believe they would damage his prospects at the next state election due in March 2010.

"The bottom line for the people of this state is that they've got a premier who is out there, who is fighting for this state, who doesn't want to be distracted by rubbish," the premier said.

"I am getting on with the job of leading this state.

"We intend to keep governing for the people of this state and not be distracted by sensational allegations that are simply not true."

Mr Rann said his friendship with Ms Chantelois ended in 2005 and he had not seen or spoken to her since.

But he said he would not say anything against her.

"I can't imagine what life she has had over the past four years," he said.

"I always found her to be a really good person, I was incredibly distressed by what I saw on television last night."

Mr Rann said his wife Sasha Carruozzo, who he married in 2006, was fully aware of his previous friendship with Ms Chantelois.

"If Sasha is comfortable with my friendships, then why should anybody else in the state not be comfortable," he said.

Earlier today, Ms Chantelois's estranged husband said Mr Rann lacked the personal qualities and character to remain in office after the alleged affair.

Rick Phillips has also called for a parliamentary inquiry into the alleged affair.

Mr Phillips, of suburban Burnside, today made his first public statement since allegedly assaulting Mr Rann with a rolled-up magazine during a function at the National Wine Centre in Adelaide in October.

He told a media conference that the relationship between Mr Rann and his estranged wife, Michelle Chantelois, had put unbearable pressure on their marriage, resulting in its collapse.

"It is my opinion that Mr Rann took advantage of my wife's youthful naivety during a very difficult time in our lives and our marriage," Mr Phillips told reporters in reading from a prepared statement.

"He has shown that he lacks the personal qualities and character to remain in the office of Premier.

"I now call for a parliamentary inquiry into the matter."

But the Premier's Labor and cabinet colleagues have declined to speak out against their leader.

Arriving at a community cabinet meeting today, Environment Minister Jay Weatherill said he was not going to comment on Mr Rann's private life. "I'm unaware of those details and they're a matter of disinterest to me," he said.

Water Security Minister Karlene Maywald, a National Party MP, was of a similar mind.

"A person's private life is a person's private life and I will do my job and continue to do my job," she said.

In the television interview, Ms Chantelois said the sexual relationship started when Mr Rann asked her to his office because "he wanted to kiss me".

"There was sex involved, there was sexual contact and intimacy involved," she said.

"Having me on his desk ... in his office."

Ms Chantelois said Mr Rann made it clear "this was going to be our little secret" and had rules including "we can't fall in love with each other".

On one occasion, the pair went to Mr Rann's office and "the clothes came off, the intercourse began," she said.

Ms Chantelois also detailed late night encounters at a city golf course.

"We would go parking ... it was always late in the evening, dark, no one could see us," she said.

Timeline of events involving South Australian Premier Mike Rann and former Parliament House barmaid Michelle Chantelois:

1985: Mike Rann elected to parliament.

1994: Mr Rann appointed leader of the opposition.

1995: Married mother Michelle Chantelois starts work as a waitress in Parliament House dining room.

March 2002: Mike Rann elected premier of South Australia.

Mid-2003: Ms Chantelois says Premier Rann gave her his mobile number and urged her to call.

Late 2003: Ms Chantelois says Mr Rann invited her to his Parliament House office because "he wanted to kiss me". She accepted the offer.

Late 2003: Ms Chantelois quits her job at Parliament House but says she maintains phone contact with the premier.

Early 2004: Ms Chantelois says when dropping her uniform back to Parliament House, Mr Rann asked her to his office, where they had sex on his desk.

Mid 2004: Ms Chantelois says the affair continued, including in the premier's house.

January 2005: Ms Chantelois says she and Mr Rann drove to an area near a city golf course and fondled each other in the car.

March 2005: Ms Chantelois says she again had sex with Mr Rann, on the floor of his Parliament House office.

Late 2005: Ms Chantelois says her husband, Richard Phillips, caught her sending a text message to the premier.

March 2006: Mr Rann re-elected as premier.

July 2006: Mr Rann marries Sasha Carruzzo.

October 1, 2009: Mr Rann allegedly assaulted by Mr Phillips at a corporate dinner. He reportedly yelled "remember my wife" before striking the premier repeatedly in the face with a rolled up magazine.

October 2: Mr Rann says he had never met Mr Phillips or knew what he was talking about before the alleged assault.

October 8: Mr Rann admits a friendship with Ms Chantelois, saying his wife was "very aware of her".

October 15: Ms Chantelois' lawyers send letter to media saying she won't comment on the controversy.

November 22: The Seven Network screens a paid interview with Ms Chantelois, who confesses to a lengthy sexual affair with the premier.

November 23: Mr Rann releases statement, saying interview was malicious and contained false allegations.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
So Mike, have you lied about having sex with this married woman? If you have you need to quit, NOW!
Posted by Steve Burgess, 23/11/2009 7:19:25 AM, on The Independent Weekly
I see the issue being that if a politician is in question for his personal behavior, then what would he/she be quite at ease with doing to the public? Those of you not in SA might not recall Rann said he didn’t even know the husband when he allegedly got smacked with a rolled up magazine. Our leaders - of ANY ilk - MUST be beyond reproach. Any trust in him as a senior figure of community values has been wiped out regardless of anything aired last night or what she says.
Posted by Paul Kuhn, 23/11/2009 8:55:41 AM, on The Independent Weekly
While hiding behind parliamentary privelege members of this government have taken the moral high ground and attacked members of the community for their own political advantage. See the IW from March 20th this year for an example. The only comeback I had to accusations made against me were in this publication and another regional paper. My sympathy to the family of this woman, particularly her husband and child. To say that I enjoyed the television programme last night would be an understatement. I wonder how much the spin of this incident is going to cost the South Australian taxpayer?
Posted by Dave, 23/11/2009 10:41:04 AM, on The Independent Weekly
I think your timeline should commence in February 1977, the time when Rann was appointed as Dunstan's press secretary. His career in SA did not start as late as 1985, as you suggest.
Posted by knut, 23/11/2009 11:21:37 AM, on The Independent Weekly
It's fair to note that Mike was a free agent at the time the alleged 'affair' began. She had the choice to call or not to call. SHE made the initial call. SHE went to his office. SHE was married, he wasn't. She is trying to portray herself as a victim here - a puppet. Come on! You've got to be joking. She claims she just wanted to 'clear the air', she's tired of the lies. If she was so concerned, why didn't she come out in the open 4 years ago when the supposed affair ended? And why didn't the husband come out earlier as well?? Seems rather contrived that he attacks the premier and all of a sudden this story comes out - and that there are dollars attached to its release. I don't particularly like Mike Rann but I don't think he deserves the crap he's getting with this debacle. Personally, I'd rather focus on his ability as a Premier than his personal mistakes. Sheesh, if we did that every parliament house around the nation would be empty!
Posted by AS, 23/11/2009 11:28:23 AM, on The Independent Weekly
What do you think the magazine was that he was hit with? BRW?
Posted by ben, 23/11/2009 12:15:58 PM, on The Independent Weekly
Mike's in deep doo-doo. The aura of invincibilty has diminished. The spin-doctors must be permanently dizzy trying to neutralize this PR catastrophe. It's amusing that the Premier's Office denied the woman's claims - why so? The alleged sexual encounters were in the office, not with the office, so the office is in the clear is it not. The dismissive remarks offered by the Premier's colleagues are not convincing either - doesn't Jay Weatherill have phone, radio, tv, internet or newspaper access? Jeez mate, I'd prefer our Ministers to be a tad better informed than you apparently are. Sack your media adviser immediately! We can bet that behind closed doors, with eyes firmly fixed on March 2010, the powerbrokers are manouvering as we speak and the campaign to discredit Ms. Chantelois will be item number one on the agenda. Interesting times indeed.
Posted by Jazzmaster, 23/11/2009 1:11:12 PM, on The Independent Weekly
Must be something wrong with my calendar. Or maybe it's deja vu! Seems like it's 26 Jan 1998 all over again - "I did not have sexual relations with that woman". I know that Mike likes to think and act like he's the President, but I don't think this is the US. “Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore". Actually Dorothy, that aint no yellow brick road either. Have a read of what President Clinton said on 26 Jan 1998 and see if you too can see the amazing similarity "Now, I have to go back to work on my State of the Union speech. And I worked on it until pretty late last night. But I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I'm going to say this again: I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie, not a single time; never. These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people. Thank you." Beautiful!
Posted by Aprilfool, 23/11/2009 2:34:34 PM, on The Independent Weekly
What a lot of nonsence this all is. She was married..........he was not. It was 5 years ago..........get over it. For the most part we are all agog with indifference. Why now, you have to ask the question.
Posted by Suzanne, 23/11/2009 3:13:26 PM, on The Independent Weekly
There are such holes in the woman's story. Eight years before any alleged sex? Not in it for the money? Which charity is getting the $200,000?. If true, does this change my opinion of a effective premier? No.
Posted by cynic, 23/11/2009 3:40:22 PM, on The Independent Weekly
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Will Michelle Chantelois' sex claims hurt Rann's chances of re-election?

Yes
(61.6%)

No
(38.4%)

Total Votes: 799
Poll Date: 23 November, 2009

Most popular articles

Indaily
1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 6%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press



Most Popular


The Independent Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...