Dr. Murray is wrong to think he shouldn't be held responsible for the death of Michael, or any patient due to the use of such a powerful anesthetic. Michael may have been an 'oddball' as the tabloids deemed him through the years, but he may not have been but a very intuitive man who loved children and all humans and animals. If he had been a female I wonder if any speculation to his love of children would have been questioned? I don't think so, even if the children had slept in the same bed as a woman, it would have been termed bonding and a comfort sharing. It's a double standard. Michael was acquitted. He didn't deserve the decimation of his life in the tabloids before any absolute truth was found, which never was. That's why he was acquitted. He had horrifying nightmares after all the trauma of the accusations, arrest, incarceration, and trial, and who wouldn't? He surely didn't deserve to die the way he did, by the hands of his own physician, in his own home, with an anesthesia used in hospitals, and used to uthenize animals -it's insane in itself to use such a powerful drug in a home setting and that's in the least negligence. I hope Joe and family get justice.